The Buddhism and failure of Ahimsa
Nazar Ul Islam Wani
Assistant professor (Islamic Studies)
Assistant professor (Islamic Studies)
The Buddhism and failure
of Ahimsa
In modern India Buddha is
sidelined, so is Religion. What is visible is the misused version of religion.
Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism all these religions are seen through the prism
of state. Even the ascetic like Buddha was philosophized into a state by Asoka.
Religion in fifth century India
was about to bring certain reforms when a Kshatriya from a tribal republic of
Sakka shaved his head and went ascetic while wearing a yellow robe. The man was
suffering from spiritual anxiety and immense metaphysical giddiness. Siddhartha
Gotama, latter known as Buddha (awakened one), achieved moksha (liberation)
through a constant beating of, what Freud called, Id and Ego, and finally
received the enlightenment.
Buddha could not bear the pain
and suffering in the world which became the main reason of him being ascetic.
Since he could not bear it, how could his creed create it? Non-violence as a
major teaching was a natural output of a religion, whose founder left the
colorful world because of pain and suffering. If we are to sum up his enlightenment, it has
been based on this principle that to live morally was to live for others. This
involves also the teachings of all the great traditions of world.
Buddha summed his teaching in
four “Noble Truths”: that existence is dukha; that the cause of our pain is
desire; that nibbana releases us from the suffering; and the way to achieve
this stage is to follow the path of knowledge, concentration…and resolution
which he called Nobel path.
Buddha can’t be placed in the
list of mystics who fled away from the society to achieve salvation. But his
asceticism brought changes within him and in the existing Hindu society of his
times. He rose against the violence and injustice of his times. He vehemently
fought against the Varna system, for which he believed that converting the
Kshatriya was necessary, and he was successful in teaching non-violence to Kshatriyas;
who were philosophically created to fight. His ‘Sangha’ if pondered carefully
was an alternative created against the aggression of the royal court. Buddha
was quite successful in breaking the heroism of Kshatriya. For Heroism is a
powerful disease, Buddha knew it and Mahabharata attested it when Yudhishtra
tells Krishna that the peace of mind is found only by giving it up. He could not fight the wars but was willing
to fight with his own self, which in Islam is named as greater-jihad.
The peaceful precepts of Buddhism
and its impact on Ashoka is a major event of history. It is a fact that the
nature of Asoka’s empire was as such that he could not stop killing for
extending his empire but Buddha contained the violence within him. So does
Religion. It regulates violence. It does not eliminate violence in total.
Neither Buddhism nor Islam, nor any religion for that matter comes to swipe all
the violence. Asoka according to the Karen Arm Strong realized that if he
became a monk the state will be run by force, by someone else, if not by him.
He could not avoid state. Mostly, no religion could avoid state and hence
violence became an indispensable thing in religion. But a prudent eye would see
that it is more an agrarian cult, the rise of civilization, city-states and
nation states which used and misused religion. Every religion at some point of
time needed a state and Buddhism for that matter could not avoid this
dilemma. Asoka is said to have killed a
man who broke the statue of Lord Buddha in latter stage of his religiosity.
In the Indian society, wherein,
the doctrine of Ahimsa was taught largely through Jainism and Buddhism and
later used by Mahatma Gandhi to fight independence, failed to practically
implement it like Asoka because India as a nation-state also demanded violence
to extend its nation. It failed to cope with the religious nature of its
society and the idea of a nation-state. It never used non-Violence as a
technique in Kashmir to win over it. It believed in force like Asoka did by
sidelining the Buddha.
Comments
Post a Comment